Sharp v. Falcon Door and Window, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Sharp v. Falcon Door and Window, Inc.

Sharp v. Falcon Door and Window, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Deneise Sharp
Defendant:	Falcon Door and Window, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2015cv00233
Filed:	December 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Cape Girardeau Office
County:	Dunklin
Presiding Judge:	Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 4, 2016	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Dunklin County, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Deneise Sharp. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Federal Claims and Amend Complaint (Doc. 22) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's federal claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, and the Americans with Disability Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Doc. 22) is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the consent Motion to Remand (Doc. 22) is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's original Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) isdenied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this matter isremanded to the Circuit Court of Dunklin County, Missouri. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 3/4/16. (CSG)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 4, 2016

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Dunklin County, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Deneise Sharp. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Federal Claims and Amend Complaint (Doc. 22) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's federal claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, and the Americans with Disability Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Doc. 22) is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the consent Motion to Remand (Doc. 22) is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's original Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) isdenied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this matter isremanded to the Circuit Court of Dunklin County, Missouri. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 3/4/16. (CSG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sharp v. Falcon Door and Window, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deneise Sharp
Represented By:	John T. Welch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Falcon Door and Window, Inc.
Represented By:	Steven H. Schwartz
Represented By:	Morgan Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?