Jones v. Corizon Medical Services et al
Plaintiff: Rodney Douglas Jones
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services, Eddie Hartline, Mina Massey and Unknown Nurse
Case Number: 1:2016cv00055
Filed: March 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Cape Girardeau
Presiding Judge: Abbie Crites-Leoni
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 88 MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones, 87 MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Jones's motions (#87, #88) to alter or amend this Court's judgment are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/18/17. (CSG)
November 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 65 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Mina Massey, Defendant Eddie Hartline, 55 MOTION to Depose Correction Officer Alexis Johnson filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones, 71 PRO SE MOTION Pursue State Malpractice Claims in form of Supplemental Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones, 61 MOTION to Amend/Correct 28 Case Management Order, MOTION to Depose Alexis Johnson filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones, 56 MOTION to Produce filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Nurse Hartline and Dr. Massey's motion for summary judgment (#65) is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Jones's motion to depose (# 55), motion to produce (#56), and motion to amend the case management order (#61) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Jones's motion to pursue state-law claims through supplemental jurisdiction (#71) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/28/17. (CSG)
July 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 52 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF 52] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/6/17. (CSG)
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 47 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Case Management Order filed by Defendant Mina Massey, Defendant Eddie Hartline, 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Mina Massey, Defendant Eddie Hart line, 42 MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones, 39 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Docket Text Order, filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for reconsideration (#3 9), to compel discovery (#42), and summary judgment (#40) are denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#30) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion to modify the case management order (#47) is granted. Motions for summary judgment are due sixty (60) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. (Dispositive Motions due by 8/1/2017.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/2/17. (CSG)
October 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint, pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with Corizon, as to defendants Eddie Hartline and Mina Massey in their individual capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in their individual capacities, defendants Eddie Hartline and Mina Massey shall reply to the amended complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendant Corizon, or as to defendants Eddie Hartline and Mina Massey in their official capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that defendant Corizon Medical Services is DISMISSED from this action.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the official capacity claims against defendants Eddie Hartline, Mina Massey, and Unknown Nurse are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thi rty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall provide the Court with the name of defendant "Unknown Nurse" in order to effect service against him/her in his/her individual capacity. An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Response to Court due by 11/7/2016. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/7/16. (CSG)
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Rodney Douglas Jones; motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in formapauperis [Doc. #2] is GRA NTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $13.36 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," an d to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before April 25, 2016, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on a Court-provided form, in accordance with the instructions set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail plaintiff a copy of the Court's form "Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Prisoner Cases" and a form pris oner complaint for filing a civil rights action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 4/25/2016, Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 4/25/2016.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 3/25/16. (CSG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Corizon Medical Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Douglas Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eddie Hartline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mina Massey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Nurse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?