Laxton v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
| Michelle Laxton |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Food and Drug Administration, Robert Califf and Sylvia Matthews Burwell |
| 1:2016cv00193 |
| July 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Personal Injury: Health Care |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 38 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Sylvia Matthews Burwell, Defendant Robert Califf, Defendant Food and Drug Administration. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss (#38) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in light of this Court's November 28, 2016 Memorandum and Order, this matter will be dismissed in its entirety. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/8/17. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss Case and Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Defendant Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss (#23) is GRANTED in part. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/28/16. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
7
CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Southeastern Division is 1:16cv193 ACL
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
