Noble v. USA

Noble v. USA

Petitioner:	Billy Joe Noble
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2016cv00204
Filed:	July 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Cape Girardeau Office
County:	Dunklin
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 7, 2016	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence filed by Petitioner Billy Joe Noble. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Billy Joe Noble's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 7; 2255 (Docket No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as time-barred. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/7/16. (CSG)
September 8, 2016	Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall show cause in writing within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order why his 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion to vacate should not be dismissed as time-barred. If movant fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this action as untimely. Show Cause Response due by 10/11/2016. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/8/16. (CSG)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 7, 2016

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence filed by Petitioner Billy Joe Noble. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Billy Joe Noble's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 7; 2255 (Docket No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as time-barred. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/7/16. (CSG)

September 8, 2016

Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall show cause in writing within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order why his 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion to vacate should not be dismissed as time-barred. If movant fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this action as untimely. Show Cause Response due by 10/11/2016. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/8/16. (CSG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noble v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Tiffany G. Becker(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Keith D. Sorrell(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Billy Joe Noble
Represented By:	Cape Fed Public Defender(Designation Public Defender or Community Defender Appointment)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?