Scherer v. Roemer et al
Gabe Scherer |
Ste. Genevieve County, Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Office, Gary Stolzer and Christopher Roemer |
1:2016cv00236 |
September 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
St. Genevieve |
Abbie Crites-Leoni |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Office, Defendant Gary Stolzer, Defendant Ste. Genevieve County, Defendant Christopher Roemer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.40) is GRANTED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 7/9/18. (CSG) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Office's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Ste. Genevieve CountySheriff's Office are DISMISSED.. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/2/18. (MRS) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Southeastern Division is 1:16cv236 ACL. (BAK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.