Wallace v. USA

Wallace v. USA

Petitioner:	Jimmy D. Wallace
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2016cv00255
Filed:	October 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Cape Girardeau Office
County:	Mississippi
Presiding Judge:	Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 1, 2016	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall notify the United States Probation Office of petitioner's "Second Petition to Vacate Sentence and Conviction Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Based on Johnson v. US" and that it is brought pursuant to Johnson, 135 S.Ct. 2551. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within a reasonable time, and in its usual course of business, the United States Probation Office shall prepare and file in petitioner's criminal case a new Resentence Report relative to his contentions under Johnson, which shall be filed under seal, with access to the Court and the parties who have entered their appearance in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the fili ng of the Probation Office's Disclosure Copy of the Resentence Report, the parties shall file, in petitioner's criminal case, simultaneous objections to the Resentence Report or statements that they have no objection. Within seven (7) days of such time, the United States Probation Office shall file a final copy of the Resentence Report in petitioner's criminal case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the Final Resentence Report by the Probation O ffice in the criminal case, the Government shall file its response to petitioner's "Second Petition to Vacate Sentence and Conviction Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Based on Johnson v. US" in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any repl y to the Government's response to the motion to vacate shall be filed, in this case, no later than fourteen (14) days from the date the response is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the document entitled "Application for Leave to File a Second Habeas Corpus Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Based on Johnson v. US" (Docket No. 1), improperly docketed in this Court as a petition under § 2255, is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/1/16. (CSG)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 1, 2016

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall notify the United States Probation Office of petitioner's "Second Petition to Vacate Sentence and Conviction Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Based on Johnson v. US" and that it is brought pursuant to Johnson, 135 S.Ct. 2551. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within a reasonable time, and in its usual course of business, the United States Probation Office shall prepare and file in petitioner's criminal case a new Resentence Report relative to his contentions under Johnson, which shall be filed under seal, with access to the Court and the parties who have entered their appearance in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the fili ng of the Probation Office's Disclosure Copy of the Resentence Report, the parties shall file, in petitioner's criminal case, simultaneous objections to the Resentence Report or statements that they have no objection. Within seven (7) days of such time, the United States Probation Office shall file a final copy of the Resentence Report in petitioner's criminal case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the Final Resentence Report by the Probation O ffice in the criminal case, the Government shall file its response to petitioner's "Second Petition to Vacate Sentence and Conviction Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Based on Johnson v. US" in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any repl y to the Government's response to the motion to vacate shall be filed, in this case, no later than fourteen (14) days from the date the response is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the document entitled "Application for Leave to File a Second Habeas Corpus Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Based on Johnson v. US" (Docket No. 1), improperly docketed in this Court as a petition under § 2255, is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/1/16. (CSG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wallace v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jimmy D. Wallace
Represented By:	Jennifer L. Booth(Designation Public Defender or Community Defender Appointment)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Tiffany G. Becker(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Allison H. Behrens(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Cristian M. Stevens(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?