Carter v. Tempermire et al
Marico Carter |
Travis Tempermire and Russell D. Oliver |
1:2017cv00203 |
November 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Dunklin |
Nannette A. Baker |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Plaintiff Marico Carter - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to reopen the present action [Doc. #8] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/18/2018. (JMC) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Marico Carter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #6] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include up on it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending final disposition of the appellate pro ceedings and post-conviction proceedings against plaintiff relating to his criminal cases of See State v. Carter, Case No. 16SD-CR01143-02 (35th Judicial Circuit, Dunklin County Court).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify the Court in wr iting concerning the final disposition of the criminal charges pending against him in See State v. Carter, Case No. 16SD-CR01143-02 (35th Judicial Circuit, Dunklin County Court). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending final disposition of the appellate proceedings and post-conviction proceedings related to the criminal charges pending against plaintiff in See State v. Carter, Case No. 16SD-CR01143-02 (35th Judicial Circuit, Dunklin County Court). This case may be reopened by plaintiff's filing of a motion to reopen the case after such final disposition.(Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 2/1/2018.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. on 1/2/18. (CSG) Modified on 1/2/2018 (CSG). |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's prisoner civil rights complaint form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis form for prisoners. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint on the Court's form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must either pay the 036;400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also file a certified copy of his priso n account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed for non-compli ance with this Order, the dismissal will not count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 1/3/2018. Response to Court due by 1/3/2018.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 12/4/17. (CSG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.