Douse v. Lewis
Petitioner: James Nathaniel Douse, Jr.
Respondent: Jason Lewis
Case Number: 1:2018cv00123
Filed: June 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Patricia L. Cohen
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Petitioner James Nathaniel Douse, Jr., 6 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) filed by Petitioner James Nathaniel Douse, Jr., 5 PETITION for Writ of Ha beas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) filed by Petitioner James Nathaniel Douse, Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's Applications for writ of habeas corpus and his supplement to the petitions, signed by James N. Douse, Sr., [Doc. #5, # 6 and #8] are STRICKEN from the Court record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send petitioner both a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and two blank § 2254 forms. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than twe nty-one (21) days from this Order, petitioner must fill out the § 2254 form, pro se, and return it to the Court. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without further proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner wishes to file a second application for writ of habeas corpus, he must file a second action in this Court. Petitioner will need to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in that action or pay the $5 filing fee at the time the action is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of his father as counsel in this matter [Doc. #7] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that James N. Douse, Sr., may not file any additional pleadings, motions or documents with this Court. If he fails to comply with this Court's Order, he may be found in contempt of Court.(Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 9/4/2018.) Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 8/13/18. (CSG)
June 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send petitioner both a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form and a § 2254 form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than twenty-eight (28) days from this Mem orandum and Order, petitioner must either pay the $5 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must fill out the § 2254 form and return it to the Court within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Order. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without further proceedings. Response to Court due by 7/3/2018. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/5/18. (CSG) Modified on 6/5/2018 (CSG).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douse v. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Nathaniel Douse, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Lewis
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke(Designation State / Local Government)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?