Akridge v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Wilburn Akridge, Jr.
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 1:2018cv00244
Filed: October 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by U.S. Marshal Service showing service on defendant by certified mail to U.S. Attorney General on 11/8/18. (CSG)
November 28, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by U.S. Marshal Service showing service on defendant by certified mail to Social Security Administration on 11/5/18. (CSG)
November 28, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by U.S. Marshal Service, Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 11/5/2018 by certified mail to U.S. Attorney, answer due 1/4/2019. (CSG)
November 7, 2018 Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Rund, Jane)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 4: Social Security Appeal. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SCHEDULING DEADLINES. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/11/18. (CSG)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/11/18. (CSG)
October 11, 2018 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr. (CSG)
October 11, 2018 Summonses Issued as to defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summonses were hand delivered to U.S. Marshal Service, Cape Girardeau, Missouri. (CSG)
October 10, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Wilburn Akridge, Jr. (Overton, Kathleen)
October 10, 2018 Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Wilburn Akridge, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Atty General, #4 Summons US Atty, #5 Summons Office of Regional Counsel)(Overton, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Akridge v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilburn Akridge, Jr.
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Jane Rund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?