Robinson v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
| David L. Robinson |
| John A. Blakely, City of Sikeston, Missouri and Charles Andrew Juden, III |
| 1:2019cv00041 |
| March 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants with receipt number 0865-7083659, in the amount of $400, Jury Demand, filed by David L. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons to City of Sikeston, #4 Summons Summons to Blakely, #5 Summons Summons to Charles Andrew Juden III)(Weiss, Charles) |
| Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Atty Weis. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.