Lam v. Parks et al
| James Lam, III |
| Steven N. Pelton, Abbie Shirrell, County of Franklin (Franklin County Sheriff's Department/County Jail), Robert Parks, County of Franklin and Matthew Houston |
| 1:2019cv00138 |
| August 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Aug 15 16:36:07 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (CMH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff James Lam, III. (CMH) |
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff James Lam, III. (CMH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff James Lam, III. (CMH) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant County of Franklin, County of Franklin (Franklin County Sheriff's Department/County Jail), Matthew Houston, Robert Parks, Steven N. Pelton, Abbie Shirrell Jury Demand,, filed by James Lam, III. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Affidavit Affidavit/Envelope)(CMH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
