Vick v. Saul
Matthew Vick |
Andrew M. Saul |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
1:2019cv00232 |
December 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Catherine D Perry |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by the U.S. Marshal Service. Office of Regional Counsel served on 1/9/2020. (CMH) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by U.S. Marshal Service. Attorney General served on 01/10/2020. (CMH) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by U.S. Marshal Service. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 01/10/2020 through U.S. Attorney's Office, answer due 3/10/2020. (CMH) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
|
|
Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was hand delivered to USM - Cape Office. (MRS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Vick. (Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Matthew Vick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Atty General, #4 Summons US Atty, #5 Summons Office of Regional Counsel)(Overton, Kathleen) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry. (CSG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.