Bice v. Stange et al
Plaintiff: Gary D. Bice
Defendant: Wesle Fluharty, Bruce Hanabrink and Warden Bill Stange
Case Number: 1:2020cv00127
Filed: June 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Shirley Padmore Mensah
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying #10 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying #11 Pro Se Motion: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 10) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a court order verification (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 07/29/20. (CMH)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 16. Wed Jul 29 11:32:09 CDT 2020 (Hency, Christy)
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER of USCA as to #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Gary D. Bice Regarding: submission of records USCA Appeal #: 20-2433 (CMH)
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER of USCA as to #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Gary D. Bice regarding appellate docketing fee of $505: The district court has determined that Appellant has three "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due August 14, 2020. USCA Appeal #: 20-2433 (CMH)
July 15, 2020 Filing 13 Initial Notification from USCA for #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Gary D. Bice USCA Appeal Number: 20-2433 (Attachments: #1 PRO SE Notice of Docket Activity)(CMH)
July 14, 2020 Filing 12 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #5 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal),. Notice of Appeal filed on 07/13/20 by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(CMH)
July 14, 2020 ***REMARK copy of Doc.'s #9-12 mailed to Gary D. Bice. (CMH)
July 13, 2020 Filing 11 PRO SE MOTION a Court Order Verification by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. (CMH)
July 13, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. (Attachments: #1 Request)(CMH)
July 13, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal), by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. (CMH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/14/2020: #1 Envelope) (CMH).
June 29, 2020 Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. (CMH)
June 29, 2020 Filing 7 Request for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. (MRS)
June 16, 2020 Filing 6 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (CSG)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: In accordance with the Opinion, Memorandum and Order entered herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a fully-paid complaint. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 6/16/20. (CSG)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a fully-paid complaint. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 6/16/20. (CSG)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4,5. Tue Jun 16 15:17:47 CDT 2020 (Gould, Cathy)
June 12, 2020 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
June 12, 2020 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah. (CMH)
June 12, 2020 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH)
June 12, 2020 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Jun 12 16:01:09 CDT 2020 (admin,)
June 10, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Gary D. Bice. (CMH)
June 10, 2020 Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Gary D. Bice. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Envelope)(CMH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bice v. Stange et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wesle Fluharty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Hanabrink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Bill Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary D. Bice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?