Krauss v. Mississippi County et al
Paul Wayne Krauss |
Jay Holcomb, Mississippi County Sheriff's Department, Mississippi County and Rob Barker |
1:2020cv00164 |
July 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
John A Ross |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (CSG) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered on this date and incorporated herein; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/24/20. (CSG) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Paul Wayne Krauss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed informa pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $77.23 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and ( 4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint, because the complaint is legally frivolous and/or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED than an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken ingood faith. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 10/15/2020.). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/24/20. (CSG) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Thu Sep 24 15:24:26 CDT 2020 (Gould, Cathy) |
Filing 4 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Paul Wayne Krauss. (CSG) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Fri Jul 31 09:17:26 CDT 2020 (Gould, Cathy) |
Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his prisoner account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Response to Court due by 8/31/2020. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/30/20. (CSG) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (CSG) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CSG) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Jul 29 16:01:15 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Paul Wayne Krauss. (CSG) |
Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Rob Barker, Jay Holcomb, Mississippi County, Mississippi County Sheriff's Department, filed by Paul Wayne Krauss. (Attachments: #1 Attachments to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Correspondence, #5 Envelope)(CSG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.