Doe v. Sikeston R-6 School District et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Tim Regenold, Andrew Delles, Sikeston R-6 School District, Jeanne Anne Sullivan and Steve Borgsmiller
Case Number: 1:2020cv00202
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Sikeston R-6 School District Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hoernschemeyer, Natalie)
September 23, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Sikeston R-6 School District Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(Hoernschemeyer, Natalie)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Brittany LeAnn Newell for Defendant Sikeston R-6 School District. (Newell, Brittany)
September 23, 2020 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Natalie A. Hoernschemeyer for Defendant Sikeston R-6 School District. (Hoernschemeyer, Natalie)
September 23, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Mississippi County, case number 19SO-CV02200-01, with receipt number AMOEDC-8165112, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Sikeston R-6 School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1: State Court File, #2 Exhibit A-2: State Court File, #3 Exhibit B: Original Filing Form, #4 Exhibit C: Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit D: Def. Delles Consent)(Hoernschemeyer, Natalie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Sikeston R-6 School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Regenold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Delles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sikeston R-6 School District
Represented By: Brittany LeAnn Newell
Represented By: Natalie A. Hoernschemeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeanne Anne Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Borgsmiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?