Benak et al v. Singh et al
Gracie Benak and Ronald Benak |
Gurwinder Singh, Aulakh Rajinder and Rajinder S. Aulakh doing business as VK Transport Inc. |
1:2020cv00243 |
November 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Stephen N Limbaugh |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RULE 16 ORDER: Joint Scheduling Plan due by 2/12/2021. Rule 16 Conference set for 2/19/2021 10:30 AM by Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/4/21. (CSG) |
Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendants Aulakh Rajinder, Gurwinder Singh. (O'Keefe, Donald) filed by Gurwinder Singh, Rajinder S. Aulakh ; ORDERED DENIED as MOOT in light of the filing of plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/30/20. (MRS) |
Filing 14 Joint ANSWER to #12 Amended Complaint by Rajinder S. Aulakh, Gurwinder Singh.(O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gracie Benak, Ronald Benak Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Counts II and IV of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint for Damages (Billam, Ashley) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint for Damages against defendant Aulakh Rajinder, Gurwinder Singh First Amended Complaint for Damages, filed by Gracie Benak, Ronald Benak.(Billam, Ashley) |
Filing 11 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Plaintiffs Gracie Benak, Ronald Benak. (Billam, Ashley) filed by Ronald Benak, Gracie Benak ; MOTION ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/9/20. (CSG) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Plaintiffs Gracie Benak, Ronald Benak. (Billam, Ashley) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Defendants Aulakh Rajinder, Gurwinder Singh. (O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 8 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendants Aulakh Rajinder, Gurwinder Singh. (O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Gurwinder Singh Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error in the wrong division. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Southeastern Division is 1:20cv243 SNLJ (BAK) |
Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, Pemiscot County, Missouri, filed by Gracie Benak, Ronald Benak.(BAK) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (BAK) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Donald L. O'Keefe, Jr for Defendants Aulakh Rajinder, Gurwinder Singh. (O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 3 Consent to Removal by Defendant Aulakh Rajinder. (O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Gurwinder Singh Sent To: Plaintiff (O'Keefe, Donald) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pemiscot County Circuit Court, case number 20PE-CC00301, with receipt number AMOEDC-8284899, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Gurwinder Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(O'Keefe, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.