Abner v. Casey's General Store
Plaintiff: Angela Abner
Defendant: Casey's General Store
Case Number: 1:2021cv00051
Filed: April 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Abbie Crites-Leoni
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2021 Filing 9 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Angela Abner, Defendant Casey's General Store. Consent to Magistrate Judge, Consent to Magistrate Judge (MRS)
May 17, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Petition by Plaintiff Angela Abner. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Amended Petition)(Tarry, Andrew)
May 17, 2021 Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff Angela Abner to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 5/24/2021. (MRS)
April 6, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Casey's General Store Sent To: State Court - Executed (Teasdale, Douglas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
April 5, 2021 Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of Mississippi County, filed by Angela Abner.(CSG)
April 5, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Casey's General Store. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Warranty Deed, #2 Exhibit Ex B. - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit Ex C. - Affidavit of Robert Truhlsen)(Teasdale, Douglas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Casey's General Store. Parent companies: Casey's General Stores, Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Teasdale, Douglas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Casey's General Store Sent To: Plaintiff (Teasdale, Douglas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mississippi County, case number 21MI-CV00092, with receipt number AMOEDC-8569882, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Casey's General Store. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet civil Cover Sheet)(Teasdale, Douglas)
April 5, 2021 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. (CSG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abner v. Casey's General Store
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Abner
Represented By: Andrew R. Tarry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Casey's General Store
Represented By: Douglas S. Teasdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?