Owens v. Mississippi County Detention Center et al
| Van Lynn Owens |
| Mississippi County Detention Center, Britton Zerrell, Mitch Pullen, Joe Ross and Britton Ferrell |
| 1:2021cv00132 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Van Lynn Owens. (MRS) |
| Filing 4 Letter to the Court from Owens re:correction of address and party name (MRS) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Sep 15 16:01:18 CDT 2021 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig. (MRS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Van Lynn Owens. (MRS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Van Lynn Owens. (MRS) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Mississippi County Detention Center, Mitch Pullen, Joe Ross, Britton Zerrell Jury Demand,, filed by Van Lynn Owens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope)(MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
