Abernathy v. Kijakazi
| Jeffrey S. Abernathy |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 1:2021cv00182 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| David D Noce |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED Social Security Transcript Notice of Filing by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Transcript 1, #2 Transcript 2, #3 Transcript 3, #4 Transcript 4, #5 Transcript 5, #6 Transcript 6, #7 Transcript 7, #8 Transcript 8, #9 Transcript 9, #10 Transcript 10, #11 Transcript 11, #12 Transcript 12, #13 Transcript 13)(Blank, Shane) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Shane Kyle Blank for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Blank, Shane) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by USAO SSA Division for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (SSA Division, USAO) (Document filed incorrectly; document deleted and refiled as #9) Modified on 12/29/2021 (KXS). |
| Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
Filing 6
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 4: Social Security Appeal. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 1/11/2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SCHEDULING DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 12/22/21. (CSG)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2]is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall electronically serve the complaint upon the Social Security Administration pursuant to this Court's Administrative Order In re: Service in Civil Actions Under the Social Security Act issued on September 10, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 12/22/21. (CSG)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL). [COPY OF ORDER AS ENTERED IN 4:21-CV-01496-UNA] The above styled and numbered case was opened on December 22, 2021 and assigned to the Eastern Division. After a review of the case, it was determined the case was assigned incorrectly. The case should have been assigned to the Southeastern Division. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled case is transferred to the Southeastern Division and assigned to the Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge, under cause number 1:21-cv-00182-DDN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that cause number 4:21-cv-01496-UNA be administratively closed. (JKL) |
| Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY IDENTIFICATION FORM as to Plaintiff Jeffrey S. Abernathy. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jeffrey S. Abernathy. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Jeffrey S. Abernathy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Olinsky, Howard) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Administrative Transcript Due 2/22/2022 (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
