Kelly v. Oesch
Plaintiff: Rickie Joe Kelly and Rickie Joe Hampton
Defendant: Amanda Oesch
Case Number: 1:2022cv00061
Filed: May 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2022 Filing 6 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (CMH)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28USC1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 06/01/22. (CMH)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Rickie Joe Kelly, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Rickie Joe Kelly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 06/01/2022. (CMH)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4-6. Wed Jun 1 16:27:25 CDT 2022 (Hency, Christy)
May 11, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed May 11 16:02:08 CDT 2022 (admin,)
May 11, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (CMH)
May 11, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH)
May 9, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Rickie Joe Kelly. (CMH)
May 9, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Rickie Joe Kelly. (CMH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly v. Oesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rickie Joe Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rickie Joe Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amanda Oesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?