Davis v. Missouri, State of
Petitioner: Bryce Davis
Respondent: Missouri, State of
Case Number: 1:2022cv00067
Filed: May 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Noelle C Collins
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition is DENIED AND DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/26/2022. (JMC)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send to petitioner a copy of the Court's prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send to petitioner a copy of the Court's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition is DENIED AND DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/26/2022. (JMC)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Prisoner Complaint Forms and IFP Motions forwarded along with mailing Thu May 26 15:32:20 CDT 2022 (Carter, Jessica)
May 20, 2022 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
May 20, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Bryce Davis. (MRS)
May 20, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (last five pages only received 5/20/22) by Petitioner Bryce Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MRS)
May 20, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri May 20 17:02:33 CDT 2022 (admin,)
May 20, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (MRS)
May 20, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Missouri, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bryce Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Missouri, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?