Shultz v. Stoddard County Jail et al
| Christopher Shultz |
| Stoddard County Jail, Carl Heffner, Dan Seger, Jason Unknown, Christina Craft, Matthew Unknown, Chris Cross, Robbin Dannemueller and Joe Unknown |
| 1:2022cv00076 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| David D Noce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Christopher Shultz. (CMH) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 1-3, 5. Thu Jul 28 16:09:21 CDT 2022 (Hency, Christy)
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable (hand delivered to office) by resident of address, Christopher Shultz Mother. Mail sent to Christopher Shultz. Returned document(s): #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner case), #1 DCM Complaint, #5 Order, #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Could not verify new address and mail was not resent. Mr. Shultz to provide the court with new address. (CMH) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Christopher Shultz. Returned document(s): #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner case), #1 DCM Complaint, #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. New address entered and clerk resent document to address as indicated on envelope of original pleading, PO Box 1883, Sikeston, MO 63801, along with Order Receipt and Document No. 5, returned on 6/13/22. (CMH) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Christopher Schultz. Returned document(s): #5 Order,. Could not verify new address and mail was not resent. (MRS) Modified on 7/7/2022 (CMH). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days after the date of this Order, plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his Pemiscot County Jail trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Response to Court due by 7/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 06/13/2022. (CMH)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. Mon Jun 13 16:00:45 CDT 2022 (Hency, Christy)
|
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (CMH) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Jun 10 15:01:22 CDT 2022 (admin,) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Christopher Shultz. (CMH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Christopher Shultz. (CMH) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Christopher Shultz. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Criminal Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(CMH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
