Fonn v. United States Office of Personal Management
Sonjay Joseph Fonn, D.O. |
United States Office of Personal Management and United States Office of Personnel Management |
1:2022cv00090 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen N Limbaugh |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. 3 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Schenk. (MRS) Modified on 7/1/2022 (MRS). |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT filed by Sonjay Joseph Fonn, DO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Schenk, Claire) Modified on 7/1/2022 (MRS). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant United States Office of Personal Management with receipt number AMOEDC-9377208, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Sonjay Joseph Fonn, DO. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons to Attorney General, #4 Summons Summons to United States Office of Personnel Management)(Schenk, Claire) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/1/2022: #5 Summons) (MRS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.