Harkey v. Stange
Petitioner: Ryan Perry Harkey
Respondent: William Stange
Case Number: 1:2022cv00111
Filed: August 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Matthew T Schelp
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Respondent William Stange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Transcript on Appeal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Sentence & Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Appellant's Statement, Brief and Argument, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Respondent's Brief, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Memorandum, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H - Appellants Brief, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I - Respondents Brief, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J - Memorandum, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K - Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing)(Hawke, Stephen)
September 6, 2022 Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Stephen D. Hawke for Respondent William Stange. (Hawke, Stephen)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 4, Administrative..Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant petition should not be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner chooses to file a reply to Respondents answer to the petition, the reply must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date the answer to the petition is filed Show Cause Response due by 10/11/2022.. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 8/24/22. (MRS)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 8/24/22. (MRS)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3,4. Wed Aug 24 15:33:26 CDT 2022 (Schaefer, Michelle)
August 19, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Ryan Perry Harkey. (MRS)
August 19, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ due.) by Petitioner Ryan Perry Harkey. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(MRS)
August 19, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Aug 19 16:01:08 CDT 2022 (admin,)
August 19, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. (MRS)
August 19, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harkey v. Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan Perry Harkey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stange
Represented By: Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?