Harkey v. Stange
Ryan Perry Harkey |
William Stange |
1:2022cv00111 |
August 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Matthew T Schelp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Respondent William Stange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Transcript on Appeal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Sentence & Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Appellant's Statement, Brief and Argument, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Respondent's Brief, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Memorandum, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G - Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H - Appellants Brief, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I - Respondents Brief, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J - Memorandum, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K - Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing)(Hawke, Stephen) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Stephen D. Hawke for Respondent William Stange. (Hawke, Stephen) |
Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 4, Administrative..Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant petition should not be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner chooses to file a reply to Respondents answer to the petition, the reply must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date the answer to the petition is filed Show Cause Response due by 10/11/2022.. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 8/24/22. (MRS) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 8/24/22. (MRS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3,4. Wed Aug 24 15:33:26 CDT 2022 (Schaefer, Michelle) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Ryan Perry Harkey. (MRS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ due.) by Petitioner Ryan Perry Harkey. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(MRS) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Aug 19 16:01:08 CDT 2022 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. (MRS) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harkey v. Stange | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Ryan Perry Harkey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: William Stange | |
Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
Represented By: | Stephen D. Hawke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.