Williamson v. Stange et al
| Lamont Williamson, Godzilla and tutor title |
| Warden Bill Stange and Clifton Cossey |
| 1:2022cv00117 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Request by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson for document #7. (document #7 forwarded to Mr. Williamson at SECC) (JMC) Modified on 11/4/2022 (JMC). |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order of Dismissal pursuant to 28U.S.C.1915(g), filed by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson motion: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration [ECF No.7] is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any additional filings in this matter, save those related to an appeal. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/24/2022. (CMH)
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. Mon Oct 24 15:06:46 CDT 2022 (Hency, Christy)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order of Dismissal pursuant to 28U.S.C.1915(g), by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Envelope)(JMC) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (CMH) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to 28U.S.C.1915(g) ORDERED the Clerk shall not file the complaint in this action FURTHER ORDERED this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff refiling a fully-paid complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 09/21/2022. (CMH)
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson, #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 3] is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is subject to DISMISSAL without prejudice to plaintiff refiling a fully-paid complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 09/21/2022. (CMH)
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4-6. Wed Sep 21 14:16:49 CDT 2022 (Hency, Christy)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson. (JDC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Lamont Williamson. (JDC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Lamont Williamson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit, #4 Envelope)(JDC) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (JDC) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JDC) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Sep 12 16:03:53 CDT 2022 (admin,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.