Cox v. Odom
| Michael E. Cox |
| Calder Odom |
| 1:2022cv00122 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Request for copies of original filing. Clerk Note: Copy of Doc #'s 1 and 2, along with a docket sheet, forwarded to Michael Cox in this case. (CMH) |
Filing 12
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael E. Cox USCA Appeal #: 22-3119 - If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days.(JMC)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael E. Cox USCA Appeal #: 22-3119. The district court has determined that Appellant has three "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due November 14, 2022.(JMC)
|
| Filing 10 Initial Notification from USCA for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael E. Cox USCA Appeal Number: 22-3119(JMC) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #6 Notice of Appeal. Notice of Appeal filed on 10/11/2022 by Plaintiff Michael E. Cox. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JMC) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 7] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/12/2022. (JMC)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. Wed Oct 12 10:43:29 CDT 2022 (Carter, Jessica)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Michael E. Cox. (JMC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order of Dismissal pursuant to 28U.S.C.1915(g), #3 Memorandum & Order, by Plaintiff Michael E. Cox. (JMC) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (MRS) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL..In accordance with the Memorandum and Order of this date and incorporated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff refiling a fully fee-paid complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/29/22. (MRS)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is subject to DISMISSAL without prejudice to plaintiff refiling a fully fee-paid complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/29/22. (MRS)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3-5. Thu Sep 29 14:49:27 CDT 2022 (Schaefer, Michelle)
|
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (MRS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Michael E. Cox. (MRS) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Calder Odom Jury Demand,, filed by Michael E. Cox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Envelope)(MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Odom | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael E. Cox | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Calder Odom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
