Rios Rosa v. Stange et al
| Angel Rios Rosa |
| Bill Stange, Charles Reed and Molly Lieja |
| 1:2022cv00126 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter to Clerk of Court from Angel David Rios Rosa (JMC) |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Angel Rios Rosa, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Angel Rios Rosa: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.00 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a blank copy of the Court's Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court-provided form and in compliance with the Court's instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 3] is DENIED at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after submission of the amended complaint, the Court will review the pleading pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 for frivolousness, maliciousness and for failure to state a claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 11/28/2022., Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 11/28/2022.). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/07/2022. (CMH)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. Along with a copy of the Courts prisoner civil rights complaint form. Mon Nov 7 11:42:02 CST 2022 (Hency, Christy)
|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 DCM Complaint by Plaintiff Angel Rios Rosa. (JMC) |
| Filing 6 Letter to Clerk of Court from Mr. Rosa (JMC) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 DCM Complaint by Plaintiff Angel Rios Rosa. (MRS) |
| Filing 4 Letter to Clerk of the Court from Rio Rosa Angel David (CMH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (CMH) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Sep 28 17:01:25 CDT 2022 (admin,) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Angel Rios Rosa. (CMH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Angel Rios Rosa. (CMH) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Angel Rios Rosa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Attachment, #4 Letter, #5 Envelope)(CMH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
