Mullis v. Dobbs et al
Mason Gage Mullis |
Mark Dobbs, Mike Jones, Dave Light, Thomas Swindle, Casey Proctor, James Keen, Samuel Unknown and Francisco Vega |
1:2022cv00135 |
October 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen N Limbaugh |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 DCM Complaint by Plaintiff Mason Gage Mullis. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter and envelope) NOTE: Copy of updated docket sheet mailed to Mason Mullis.(CMH) |
Filing 4 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Mason Gage Mullis. (CMH) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Mason Gage Mullis. (JMC) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Mason Gage Mullis. (JMC) |
Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Mason Gage Mullis. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Envelope)(JMC) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JMC) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (JMC) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Oct 13 15:01:08 CDT 2022 (admin,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.