Essmyer v. Huelskamp Law, LLC et al
| Connie Essmyer |
| Huelskamp Law, LLC and Perry County Memorial Hospital |
| 1:2022cv00140 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Connie Essmyer Process Server: Mark Effinger (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard A. Voytas, Jr for Plaintiff Connie Essmyer. (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Huelskamp Law, LLC, Perry County Memorial Hospital with receipt number AMOEDC-9572175, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Connie Essmyer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Voytas, Richard) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. 2 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Voyas Law. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
