Coger v. Poplar Bluff Police Department et al
| Mark Coger, Jr. |
| Poplar Bluff Police Department, Cynthia Merriot and Missouri Board of Probation and Parole |
| 1:2022cv00158 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED at this time as plaintiff has been released from confinement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide plaintiff with a copy of a form "Application to Proceed in District Court without Paying Fees or Costs" for civil litigants (non-prisoners). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by January 6, 2023, plaintiff shall file a completed form "Application to Proceed in District Court without Paying Fees or Costs" for civil litigants (non-prisoners). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a blank copy of the Courts Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by January 6, 2023, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court's Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form and in compliance with the Court's instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for emergency injunction and restraining order (ECF No. 4) is DENIED as moot, as plaintiff has been released from confinement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after submission of the amended complaint, the Court will review the pleading pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 for frivolousness or maliciousness, and for failure to state a claim.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to timely and fully comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice. ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 1/6/2023.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/16/2022. (JMC)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7. Prisoner Complaint Form and IFP Motion forwarded along with memoramdum and order Fri Dec 16 16:12:37 CST 2022 (Carter, Jessica)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 DCM Complaint by Plaintiff Mark Coger, Jr. (JMC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Mark Coger, Jr. (JMC) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Nov 18 17:01:35 CST 2022 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (CMH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Emergency Injunction and Restraining Order by Plaintiff Mark Coger, Jr. (CMH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Mark Coger, Jr. (CMH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Mark Coger, Jr. (CMH) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants, filed by Mark Coger, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Attachment 1, #4 Attachment 2, #5 Envelope)(CMH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
