Modicue v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
| Bruce Modicue |
| AT&T Corp. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company |
| 1:2022cv00174 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Julia Ann Pair for Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. (Pair, Julia) |
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2, Standard Discovery Completion due by 2/16/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 3/18/2024. Jury Trial set for 6/24/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4B - Cape before District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. Pretrial Compliance due by 6/4/2024. Motion in Limine due by 6/14/2024.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/22/23. (MRS)
|
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr:Rule 16 Conference held on 5/22/2023. Conference held by phone. CMO to issue. (Notice only, no.pdf attached.). (proceedings started: 10:30) (proceedings ended: 10:40) (Appearance for Plaintiff: William Wooten)(Appearance for Defendant: Amanda Colvin) (MRS) |
| Filing 8 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. and Plaintiff Modicue. (Colvin, Amanda) |
|
Filing 7
RULE 16 ORDER Joint Scheduling Plan due by 5/15/2023. Rule 16 Conference set for 5/22/2023 10:30 AM by Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/14/2023. (JMC)
|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Inc., AT&T Fiber Investment Holdings, LLC, BlackRock Inc. (Colvin, Amanda) Modified on 4/14/2023 (CBL). |
| Filing 5 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.(Colvin, Amanda) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. The summons was emailed to Attorney Wooten. (MRS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Bruce Modicue. AT&T Corp. served on 2/21/2023, answer due 3/14/2023. (Wooten, William) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT Naming Southwestern Bell Telephone Company against defendant AT&T Corp.,Terminating AT&T Corp. Amendment to #1 Complaint, Naming Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, filed by Bruce Modicue. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Bruce Modicue. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter Right to Sue Letter)(Wooten, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant AT&T Corp. with receipt number AMOEDC-9692784, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Bruce Modicue. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Right to Set, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Summons in a Civil Action)(Wooten, William) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Plaintiff's counsel. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
