Varvil v. Stange
Petitioner: Jonathan Varvil
Respondent: Bill Stange
Case Number: 1:2023cv00013
Filed: January 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John M Bodenhausen
Referring Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send to petitioner a copy of its motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. Response to Court due by 4/5/2023. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/6/2023. (JMC)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. IFP form included in mailing Mon Mar 6 12:55:45 CST 2023 (Carter, Jessica)
February 9, 2023 Filing 4 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr for all further proceedings (JMC)
January 25, 2023 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
January 25, 2023 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Jan 25 15:02:12 CST 2023 (admin,)
January 25, 2023 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JMC)
January 25, 2023 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JMC)
January 24, 2023 Filing 2 Letter to Clerk of Court from Mr. Varvil re:filing fee (JMC)
January 24, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee due $ 5.) by Petitioner Jonathan Varvil. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varvil v. Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan Varvil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bill Stange
Represented By: Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?