Proudie v. Stange
| Dyanthany Proudie |
| Bill Stange |
| 1:2023cv00033 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Petition (Doc. #13 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file the amended petition on or before July 21, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 5/3/2023. (ESD)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Petition ;Extension to file the following: Amended Petition ;Proposed extension date 07/21/2023 by Petitioner Dyanthany Proudie. (Hernandez, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's premature show cause response (Doc. 11) is STRICKEN from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file the show cause response in accordance with the Case Management Order (Doc. 8).. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 4/26/23. (MRS)
|
| Filing 11 STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD.(4/26/23)..RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #8 Case Management Order, by Respondent Bill Stange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Trial Transcript Part 1, #2 Exhibit 1 DA Trial Transcript Part 2, #3 Exhibit 2 DA Legal File, #4 Exhibit 3 DA Appellant's Brief, #5 Exhibit 4 DA Respondent's Brief, #6 Exhibit 5 DA Appellant's Reply Brief, #7 Exhibit 6 DA Opinion, #8 Exhibit 7 DA Docket Sheet, #9 Exhibit 8 PCR Transcript, #10 Exhibit 9 PCR Legal File, #11 Exhibit 10 PCR Appellant's Appendix, #12 Exhibit 11 PCR Appellant's Brief, #13 Exhibit 12 PCR Respondent's Brief, #14 Exhibit 13 PCR Opinion, #15 Exhibit 14 PCR Mandate, #16 Exhibit 15 PCR Docket Sheet, #17 Exhibit 16 Offender Search)(Spillane, Michael) Modified on 4/26/2023 (MRS). |
| Filing 10 FULL CONSENT has been received by Petitioner Dyanthany Proudie, Respondent Bill Stange. (JMC) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J. Spillane for Respondent Bill Stange. (Spillane, Michael) |
|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 4 Habeas Corpus Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 4/18/2023. Show Cause Response due by 5/12/2023. SEE ORDER FOR DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 3/28/2023. (JMC)
|
| Filing 7 Receipt: $ 5, receipt number 5251 Filing Fee. (JMC) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to Petitioner a copy of the Court's form motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit in support-habeas cases. Response to Court due by 4/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 03/22/23. (CMH)
|
| ***REMARK - Copy of #6 Order, along with a copy of the Court's form motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit in support habeas cases, mailed to Petitioner as Ordered. (CMH) |
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Leave to File Amended Petition Within Sixty Days by Petitioner Dyanthany Proudie. (Hernandez, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Jennifer Hernandez for Petitioner Dyanthany Proudie. (Hernandez, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Kent E Gipson for Petitioner Dyanthany Proudie. (Gipson, Kent) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Mar 15 16:00:40 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (MRS) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 - due.) by Petitioner Dyanthany Proudie. (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Proudie v. Stange | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dyanthany Proudie | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Hernandez |
| Represented By: | Kent E Gipson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bill Stange | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Spillane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
