Williams v. Swims et al
| Mose S. Williams |
| Garret A. Swims, Phillip M. Dobbs, William H. Petty, Bill Staynz and Benjamin Crass |
| 1:2023cv00094 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Mose S. Williams. (CMH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Mose S. Williams. (MRS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Mose S. Williams. (MRS) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Benjamin Crass, Phillip M. Dobbs, William H. Petty, Bill Staynz, Garret A. Swims Jury Demand,, filed by Mose S. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Correspondence, #4 Envelope)(MRS) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Jun 5 15:01:26 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry Edward Autrey. (MRS) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
