Ross v. Stain et al
| Robert Ross |
| Bill Stain, Latonia Young-Griffin, Caitlin Douglas, Lorien Armstrong, Cossey Cliffton, Brian Hoskage, Jason Lewis, Cynthia Reese and Ann Precythe |
| 1:2023cv00159 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert Ross. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(JMC) |
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Robert Ross. (JMC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Robert Ross. (JMC) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants jury Demand,, filed by Robert Ross. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(JMC) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Sep 14 12:01:24 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JMC) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (JMC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
