Holmes v. Missouri Department of Corrections
Antonio Holmes |
Missouri Department of Corrections |
1:2023cv00187 |
October 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen R Welby |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice due to petitioners failure to exhaust state remedies.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/20/23. (MRS) |
Filing 5 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state remedies. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/20/23. (MRS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Mon Nov 20 16:45:27 CST 2023 (Schaefer, Michelle) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Oct 23 13:01:10 CDT 2023 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (MRS) |
Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Petitioner Antonio Holmes. (MRS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Antonio Holmes. (MRS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee-ifp.) by Petitioner Antonio Holmes. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(MRS) Modified on 10/23/2023 (MRS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Holmes v. Missouri Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Antonio Holmes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Missouri Department of Corrections | |
Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.