Jones v. Steele Police
Matthew Jones |
Steele Police |
1:2023cv00218 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Abbie Crites-Leoni |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/13/23. (MRS) |
Filing 4 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Matthew Jones motion is GRANTED, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim and frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B).. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/13/23. (MRS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4,5. Wed Dec 13 15:57:49 CST 2023 (Schaefer, Michelle) |
Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Dec 12 16:01:44 CST 2023 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (MRS) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Jones. (MRS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Steele Police Jury Demand,, filed by Matthew Jones.(MRS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/12/2023: #1 Envelope) (MRS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Steele Police | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Steele Police | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.