Johnson v. Stange
Petitioner: Stanley Johnson
Respondent: Bill Stange
Case Number: 1:2024cv00162
Filed: August 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Patricia L Cohen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Stanley Johnson Regarding: $605 appellate filing and docketing fee. The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in formapauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. A motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must include a completed copy of the attached "Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs" or an affidavit that shows in the same detail the Appellant's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP statusby November 21, 2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. USCA Appeal #: 24-3026 (CMH)
October 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re #18 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal filed by Stanley Johnson - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 18] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/21/2024. (JMC)
October 21, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 19. Mon Oct 21 14:16:22 CDT 2024 (Carter, Jessica)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Stanley Johnson Regarding: Appointment of Counsel USCA Appeal #: 24-2926. Stanley Johnson's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. (MRS)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 LETTER from USCA USCA Appeal #: 24-3026 re: appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis - (motion not attached)(JMC)
October 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal by Petitioner Stanley Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Letter from COA, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(CMH)
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Stanley Johnson Regarding: Original File USCA Appeal #: 24-3026 (MRS)
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER of USCA as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Stanley Johnson USCA Appeal #: 24-3026. The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by October 24, 2024, an order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.(MRS)
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Initial Notification from USCA for #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Stanley Johnson USCA Appeal Number: 24-3026 (Attachments: #1 Pro Se NDA)(MRS)
October 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #10 Notice of Appeal. Notice of Appeal filed on 10/1/24. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(MRS)
October 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL to Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal by Petitioner Stanley Johnson. (MRS)
October 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal) by Petitioner Stanley Johnson. (MRS)
September 20, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Fri Sep 20 10:36:53 CDT 2024 (Hency, Christy)
September 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re #8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stanley Johnson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 8] is DENIED as this action is closed and there is no notice of appeal currently on file. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 09/19/2024. (CMH)
September 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Stanley Johnson. (CMH)
September 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Request for status of case by Petitioner Stanley Johnson. NOTE: Copy of docket sheet sent to Stanley Johnson at SECC, Charleston, MO. (CMH)
September 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be granted. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/5/2024. (JMC)
September 6, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Fri Sep 6 08:49:20 CDT 2024 (Carter, Jessica)
September 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall strike all respondents in this action except for the proper respondent, Warden Bill Stange. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED without prejudice as an unauthorized successive habeas application. A separate Order of Dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 3] is DENIED AS MOOT.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/5/2024. (JMC) Modified on 9/6/2024 (JMC).
August 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto)
August 29, 2024 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS)
August 29, 2024 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Aug 29 17:01:17 CDT 2024 (admin,)
August 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (MRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stanley Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bill Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?