Wright v. Salisbury, Missouri et al
Bill W. Wright |
City of Salisbury, Missouri, Joe Fehling, Bill Leach, Doug Farnen, Reuben Tisdale, Eddie Hubbard, Mitchell Stephens and John Standfield |
2:2007cv00056 |
December 10, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
M Office |
Audrey G. Fleissig |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
M |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief under the Missouri Sunshine Law. All claims against all parties having been resolved, a separate final Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/22/2010. (NCL) |
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 83 MOTION for Reconsideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Sunshine Law Claim filed by Defendant Reuben Tisdale, Defendant Bill Leach, Defendant Mitchell Stephens, Defendant Eddie Hubbard, De fendant Doug Farnen, Defendant City of Salisbury, Missouri, Defendant John Standfield, Defendant Joe Fehling. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. [Doc. #83] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Courts determination s hall be stayed pending a ruling in Purcell. Defendants shall file notice with the Court within five (5) days of the issuance of the Purcell opinion, and the parties shall have ten (10) days following the filing of such notice simultaneously to file supplemental briefs addressing the impact, if any, of the Purcell opinion on the issues before this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 03/09/2010. (CBL) |
Filing 61 ORDER regarding 49 MOTION in Limine: ORDERED GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART (see order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/7/10. (TRC) |
Filing 46 ORDER: ORDERED that at the final pretrial conference, the parties shall be prepared to argue Defendants' First Motion for Sanctions or, in the Alternative,Defendants' First Motion in Limine 24 ; Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Punitiv e Damages Portion of Trial 44 ; and any other motions in limine or pretrial motions timely filed by the parties. The final pretrial conference shall be held in chambers in St. Louis. Trial counsel are required to attend.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/29/09. (CEL) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Jointly Filed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Count III of Plaintiffs Complaint, and DENIED as to Counts I and II of Plaintiff's Complaint. 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a new scheduling conference shall be set byseparate Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/10/09. (TRC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.