Sexton v. Hannibal, Missouri, City of et al
| Mary Sexton |
| Hannibal, Missouri, City of, Jim Behrens, Bob Gilstrap, Beth Knight, Steve Ayers, Jim Coleberd, Melanie Campbell, Steve Terry, Jeff Lagarce and Beau Hicks |
| 2:2009cv00008 |
| March 2, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Ralls |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Hannibal Defendants motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Count III, and DENIED in other regards with respect to Defendant Terry. [Doc. # 69 ]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Def endant Hickss motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Counts I, III, IV, V, and Count II based upon an alleged equal protection violation, and DENIED as to Count II based upon an alleged First amendment violation. [Doc. #66] Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/27/11. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for sanctions due to spoliation of evidence is DENIED. [Doc. #73]re: 73 MOTION for Sanctions Spoliation of Evidence filed by Plaintiff Mary Sexton. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/14/2011. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Beau Hick's motion for sanctions is DENIED. [Doc. #82]. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/10/2011. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to quash Plaintiff's subpoenas and notices of deposition, and for a protective order is GRANTED. [Doc. #57] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's m otion for a protective order is DENIED as moot. [Doc. #60] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Hicks shall make a good faith effort to obtain a copy of his 2007 state and federal tax returns and provide same to Plaintiff as soon as he is able to obtain a copy. Defendant shall also provide Plaintiff with the authorizations he offered with respect to his casino gambling records, along with any thing else, such as a "player's card," that may be needed for the casinos t o honor the authorizations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for sanctions against Defendant Hicks for failure to comply with this Courts discovery Order of July 8, 2010 is DENIED. [Doc. #61] Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/18/2010. (NCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
