Holt v. Barnes

Holt v. Barnes

Plaintiff:	Kenneth Holt
Defendant:	James Barnes
Case Number:	2:2009cv00022
Filed:	May 18, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Hannibal Office
County:	Pike
Presiding Judge:	E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2009	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 9/28/09. (KLH)
May 19, 2009	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay the $350 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. ORDERED that if pl aintiff fails to timely pay the filing fee, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, in compliance with this Order, no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. FU RTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, or if the complaint fails to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b). Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 6/19/2009. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 5/19/09. (KLH)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2009

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 9/28/09. (KLH)

May 19, 2009

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay the $350 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. ORDERED that if pl aintiff fails to timely pay the filing fee, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, in compliance with this Order, no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. FU RTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, or if the complaint fails to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b). Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 6/19/2009. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 5/19/09. (KLH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holt v. Barnes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Holt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: James Barnes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?