Shields v. Correctional Medical Services et al
Plaintiff: Terrell Shields
Defendant: Jesse B. Masten
Case Number: 2:2011cv00008
Filed: January 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Hannibal Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Jesse Masten's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 49.) A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 10/31/2012. (NCL)
March 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.70 within thirty (30) days of the date of th is Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendant Masten. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendant Masten shall reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided by the applicable pro visions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Correctional Medical Services or Minor because, as to these defendants, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/9/2011. (NCL)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a proper inmate account statement, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, no later than February 18, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court willdismiss this action for failure to prosecute. Dated this 28th day of January, 2011. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/28/11. (JWJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shields v. Correctional Medical Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesse B. Masten
Represented By: Maureen C. Beekley
Represented By: Joel A. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrell Shields
Represented By: Ryan P. Schuenke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?