Murphy v. Campbell et al
| Michael Murphy |
| Corizon, Inc., Thomas Cabrerea and Gary Campbell |
| 2:2012cv00022 |
| March 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Pike |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 18 ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 18], is granted. A separate judgment will be entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 6/27/13. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.75 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to all of the defendants. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants shall reply to plaintiff's claims wi thin the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 6/30/2012.). Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/30/12. (CEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
