Traver v. Randolph County Jail et al
James Matthew Traver |
Geneen Hilhilern, Carol Bachelor, Bruce Pierce, Earl Endsley, Randy Smith, Randolph County Jail, Mark Nicoles and Randolph County Nursing Staff |
2:2013cv00038 |
May 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Hannibal Office |
St. Francois |
E. Richard Webber |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, why his complaint should not be summarily dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Show Cause Response due by 7/25/2013.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on July 11, 2013. (BRP) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Do. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $2.65 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk mail to plaintiff a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. If plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this action without futher proceedings. ( Response to Court due by 6/16/2013.) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 05/15/2013. (CBL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.