Shives v. Colvin

Shives v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Roseanne Shives
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2014cv00029
Filed:	March 11, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Hannibal Office
County:	Randolph
Presiding Judge:	Nannette A. Baker
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 4, 2015	Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Application for Attorneys Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Doc. 37 .] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Social Security Administration shall remit to Karen Kraus Bill, assignee, attorneys fees in the amount of $4,628.86, subject to any pre-existing debt that the Plaintiff owes the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 8/4/15. (KJS)
March 24, 2015	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief which Shives seeks in her Complaint and Brief in Support of Plaintiffs Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Docs. 1 , 25 .] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioners dec ision of September 13, 2012 is REVERSED and REMANDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon remand the ALJ must formulate a new residual functional capacity assessment for Plaintiffs mental impairments only and evaluate all of the medical opinion evidence in the record, including the consultative examination of Mark Schmitz. A separate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 3/24/15. (KJS)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 4, 2015

Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Application for Attorneys Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Doc. 37 .] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Social Security Administration shall remit to Karen Kraus Bill, assignee, attorneys fees in the amount of $4,628.86, subject to any pre-existing debt that the Plaintiff owes the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 8/4/15. (KJS)

March 24, 2015

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief which Shives seeks in her Complaint and Brief in Support of Plaintiffs Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Docs. 1 , 25 .] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioners dec ision of September 13, 2012 is REVERSED and REMANDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon remand the ALJ must formulate a new residual functional capacity assessment for Plaintiffs mental impairments only and evaluate all of the medical opinion evidence in the record, including the consultative examination of Mark Schmitz. A separate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 3/24/15. (KJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shives v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roseanne Shives
Represented By:	Karen Kraus Bill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Nicholas P. Llewellyn(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?