Buchanan v. Kapur et al
| Stephanie Marie Buchanan |
| Hari Kapur, William Rice, Marilyn Horn, Tom Dunn, Tom Bredeman and Deloise Williams |
| 2:2015cv00005 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Audrain |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Hari Kapur, M.D. andCorizon, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment 55 is granted as to plaintiff Stephanie Marie Buchanan's Eighth Amendment claims of deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs, and these claims are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Buchanan's remaining state law claims of medical negligence are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that defendants' Motion for Entry of Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment 69 , based on Buchanans failure to respond to the motion, is denied as moot. Judgment is entered accordingly. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on September 11, 2017. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration regarding the appointment of an independent expert witness 65 is denied to the extent she requests the appointment of an expert. To the extent plaintiff requests that she be permitted to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment without the assistance of an expert, the motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file her response to defendants' motion for summary judgment no later than July 10, 2017. This deadline will not be extended further. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 6/5/2017. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Independent Expert Witness(es) 59 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Third Amended Case Management Order 58 is GRANTED in part. (See Full Order for amended deadlines.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/23/2017. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Hari Kapur, M.D., and Corizon, LLC's Motion for More Definite Statement 45 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order , plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in the following format: 1) Plaintiff shall set forth in the caption of the amended complaint the name of each defendant she wishes to sue. 2) Plaintiff shall set forth her "Statement of Claim" b y listing the first defendants name, and under that name, she shall set forth in separate numbered paragraphs the allegations supporting her claim(s) as to that particular defendant, as well as the right(s) that she claims that particular defenda nt violated. Plaintiff shall proceed in this manner with each of the named defendants, separately setting forth each individual name and under that name, in numbered paragraphs, the allegations specific to that particular defendant and the right(s ) that she claims that particular defendant violated. 3) The amended complaint must contain short and plain statements showing that plaintiff is entitled to relief; the allegations must be simple, concise, and direct; and the numbered paragraphs mus t each be limited to a single set of circumstances. 4) Plaintiff shall sign the amended complaint. Because an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and all previously-filed pleadings and supplements, plaintiff must include each and ever y one of the claims she wishes to pursue in the amended complaint. See, e.g., In re Wireless Tel. Fed. Cost Recovery Fees Litig., 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). The amended complaint may not refer back to or incorporate by reference any previous complaints. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Order, the Court will proceed on the amended complaint filed by appointed counsel (ECF #15). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on September 26, 2016. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $61.06 with in thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make her remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) her name; (2) her prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days, without first showing good cause, the Court will dismiss this action without pre judice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before April 11, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's pro se motion for a preliminary injunction [Doc. # 4 ] is DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the Court's differentiated case management system, this case is assigned to Track 5B (standard prisoner actions). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 03/11/2015. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
