Sanders v. Women's Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center et al
Sidea S. Sanders |
Women's Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center and Unknown Terry |
2:2017cv00048 |
July 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Hannibal Office |
Audrain |
David D. Noce |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.00 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of t his Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and ( 4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order /~al will be filed forthwith.. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 08/18/2017. (KCB) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff must submit a copy of her prison trust account statement for the six- month period before the filing of the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 7/25/2017. (CLO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.