Ivey v. Audrain County, Missouri et al
||Audrain County, Missouri, Stephanie Hildebrand and John Doe
||November 27, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||Catherine D. Perry
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 16, 2019
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Audrain County, Nathanael Atkinson, Richard White, and Nicholas Jensens Motion for summary judgment 82 is granted only as to the claim that Audrain County policies were constitutionally deficient and caused Mark Iveys death and is denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions for Partial Summary Judgment for Defendant Brown-Foote 86 and Defendant Hildebrand 87 are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for Defendant Advanced Correctional HealthCare 88 is granted only as to the claim that Audrain County policies were constitutionally deficient and caused Mark Iveys death and is denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Jane Turner 93 is denied without prejudice to reconsider at trial whether any part of the proposed testimony should be excluded. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 07/16/2019. (KCB)
|November 28, 2017
CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Northern Division is 2:17cv82 NAB (BAK)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?