Rummans v. Chester Bross Construction Company
| Joseph Rummans |
| Chester Bross Construction Company |
| 2:2018cv00091 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Catherine D Perry |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #16 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Joseph Rummans. (Cosgrove, David) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Joseph Rummans. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Amended Complaint)(Cosgrove, David) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, & Affirmative Defenses by Chester Bross Construction Company.(Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE. This case is assigned to Track: 2 (Standard. ) Joint Scheduling Plan due by 1/4/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 1/11/2019 at 9:30 AM in Telephone before District Judge Catherine D. Perry. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/3/18. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Chester Bross Construction Companys motion to dismiss #10 is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Joseph Rummans' claim for reckless infliction of emotional distress is dismissed without prejudice. This case will be set for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by separate Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/3/18. (EAB)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Chester Bross Construction Company. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Joseph Rummans. (Cosgrove, David) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Chester Bross Construction Company. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, a request has been received for random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen to District Judge Catherine D. Perry for all further proceedings. (CBL) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Chester Bross Construction Company. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael E. Kaemmerer for Defendant Chester Bross Construction Company. (Kaemmerer, Michael) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Bryan M. Kaemmerer for Defendant Chester Bross Construction Company. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Joseph Rummans. Chester Bross Construction Company served on 10/23/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (Cosgrove, David) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Northern Division is 2:18cv91 PLC. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Joseph Rummans Process Server: Pro Serve (Attachments: #1 Summons Unexecuted Summons)(Cosgrove, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Joseph Rummans with receipt number 0865-6817825, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Joseph Rummans. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX 1, #2 Exhibit EX 2, #3 Exhibit EX 3)(Cosgrove, David) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/16/2018) (BAK). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2018: #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form) (BAK). |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney David B. Cosgrove. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rummans v. Chester Bross Construction Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chester Bross Construction Company | |
| Represented By: | Bryan M. Kaemmerer |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Kaemmerer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Rummans | |
| Represented By: | David B. Cosgrove |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
