Hurley v. Berryhill
| Tammy R. Hurley |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2018cv00108 |
| December 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: administrative. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 12/6/18. (CLA)
|
| Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Karen Kraus Bill. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT with receipt number 0865-6908440, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Tammy R. Hurley. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Bill, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
